Seven starting points
Demonstrable patterns, not promises
The same building blocks, grounded retrieval, permission trimming and citation, drop into any
regulated customer. Each is demonstrable on representative data, or on your own, behind your
firewall. Not on the list? It probably still fits: tell us what you hold and what you want to ask of it.
USE CASE 01Your policies and procedures, answered with sources
For compliance, operations and IT teams
Staff ask Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini and get an answer drawn from your own policies, procedures and reports, with a link to the page it came from. Nothing is exported to build it. The assistant signs in as the person asking and sees only the files that person could already open.
Outcome that mattersTime back for the people who search for documents, and an AI rollout that passes access review because the controls are the ones you already run.
USE CASE 02KYC, AML and investigations
For financial services and investigations teams
Identity documents, contracts, prior records, related accounts, transaction narratives and connected parties pulled from siloed shares into one grounded, cited pack, trimmed to what each investigator may already see.
Outcome that mattersReview packs in minutes rather than hours. Investigators spend their time deciding, not hunting, and every fact is traceable for the audit trail.
USE CASE 03Every obligation in your contract estate, found before it bites
For legal, procurement and finance
Renewal dates, notice periods and obligations surface from the agreements you already hold, across shares and SharePoint. Ask which contracts involve a counterparty, who signed them and what they commit you to. The knowledge graph keeps relationships an agreement actually states separate from names that simply appear together.
Outcome that mattersNo renewal missed for want of reading, and diligence questions answered with the documents that prove the answer.
USE CASE 04A defensible baseline before you classify, migrate or clean up
For data governance, security and storage teams
Before a records programme or a migration, Discover measures what you actually hold from the index K-Lake has already built. It shows what is stale, duplicated, unowned or open to everyone, where it sits and who owns it, and every number links to the files behind it.
Outcome that mattersExposure fixed before an assistant is ever connected, which is the order a regulator would expect to see.
USE CASE 05AI for the data that is never allowed to leave
For defence, public sector, financial services and healthcare
Retrieval, indexing and permission checks run entirely inside your boundary, with extraction, OCR and transcription on engines you host. Licensing is validated offline. Pair K-Lake with a local model and nothing crosses at all, including on sites with no internet connection.
Outcome that mattersA security posture your reviewers can test for themselves, with the same experience on a disconnected site as on a connected one.
USE CASE 06Recordings you can search by what was said
For training, research, media and investigations teams
Calls, interviews, hearings and training video are transcribed on self-hosted models and indexed alongside your documents. Text shown on screen is searchable too, and every result opens at the moment the words were spoken.
Outcome that mattersAn assistant that can cite the minute a statement was made, instead of someone replaying hours of recordings to find it.
USE CASE 07One deployment, many customers, each kept apart
For managed service providers and platform partners
Offer each of your customers governed AI over their own data without building separate infrastructure for each. Every source, user and file belongs to exactly one tenant, isolated in the database. Each tenant gets its own MCP endpoint and identity provider, and licensing supports your own branding.
Outcome that mattersIsolation simple enough to explain to a customer’s security team in one sentence, with licensing ready for marketplace sale.
USE CASE 08Know what is sensitive before an AI sees it
For CISOs, data protection officers and information governance teams
K-Lake classifies every file it indexes as public, internal, confidential or restricted, and shows the evidence behind each label. Rules then decide what search and AI may return, enforced in the data layer rather than in the assistant.
Outcome that mattersA DPO who can show exactly which restricted content an assistant is able to reach, and prove that the answer is none.
How the security story actually works
K-Lake keeps the document estate, index and permission enforcement inside the customer's
environment. Pointed at a cloud model such as Copilot, only the specific retrieved,
permission-checked snippet is sent, under the customer's own agreement with that vendor.
For fully sovereign cases, K-Lake runs air-gapped against a local model, demonstrated with
the internet physically switched off.